Are you a no-vax?

“Are you a no-vax?”

- It sounds like an accusation.

“Are you trying to evade the question?”

- Before answering, can I tell you a little anecdote?

“All right”.

- Your question reminds me of a journalist interviewing the director of a film, where female characters were definitely not very nice. So, during the interview, she suddenly asked the director: ‘Are you a misogynist?’ Faced with that question, and in an attempt to defend himself, he replied by saying: ‘What are you saying? I love all women!’

“Sorry, but what does it have to do with my question?”

- Now I’ll explain. The director’s answer, understandable considering the nature of the question, betrays a logical error. Because you see, it is not necessary to ‘love all women’ in order not to be a misogynist: it is enough to ‘love some women’. The problem is that the director, knowingly or not, had the premonition that if he answered in a logically correct way, his defense would not be perceived as sufficient. Because it is easy to imagine that the journalist too cultivated the prejudice that ‘not loving all women’ means ‘hating them all’.

“I really don’t understand where you want to go.”

- A bit of patience. The logical error I am talking about is that which consists in believing that the negation of ‘always’ is ‘never’. That is, the ‘negation of something’ is confused with ‘the opposite of something’. It is legitimate to…